The Mill Fire is one of the most recent wildfires that has devastated the Siskiyou County. On September 2nd, 2022, thousands of residents were evacuated, and the wildfire quickly burned over 4,000 acres of land in less than 24 hours. Reports suggest that the fire may have started near Roseburg Forest Products, and is being actively investigated to determine if the company is to blame. If you have suffered losses due to the Mill Fire, Matt Huffman Law is here to help. Our attorneys have extensive experience in handling claims for victims of preventable wildfires and will work with you to determine the compensation you deserve for your losses. Call us today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can help you with your Mill Fire Lawsuit.
The Mill Fire, which started on September 2, 2022, began in a warehouse located in Weed, CA, before spreading to a nearby neighborhood and rapidly growing. According to reports, it destroyed around 4,000 acres of land, more than 100 homes, and claimed the lives of two individuals while injuring three others. According to the incident report filed by Cal Fire, the fire was not simply a result of the hot, dry weather in Northern California at the time but was caused by an unknown reason, still under investigation. However, Roseburg Forest Products, which operates a mill in Weed that manufactures wood veneer products, admitted within days that the fire appeared to have originated in one of their structures, Shed 17. This 60-foot tall wooden structure housed a large concrete container used to store smoldering ash from the company’s wood cogeneration power plant, and employees reported previous fires breaking out in it.
After the incident, Roseburg issued a statement stating that they believed the fire started due to a malfunctioning sprinkler system provided by a third party. If anyone lost their homes, suffered an injury, or lost a loved one due to the Mill Fire, they could seek compensation for their losses or injury by filing a claim against Roseburg’s insurance policy. Contact Matt Huffman Law, today for a free consultation.
The devastating Mill Fire that occurred during the 2022 California wildfire season. It rapidly spread through Siskiyou County in California, impacting several communities, including Weed, Lake Shastina, and Edgewood. The fire destroyed more than 100 homes and burned over 4,200 acres of land. The blaze caused significant damage to the Lincoln Heights area of Weed, which was founded by Black mill workers in the 1920s and is a historically Black community. Despite the firefighters’ efforts, the fire raged for three days, leading to tragic deaths. The local officials are still assessing the extent of the damage caused by the Mill Fire.
If you have suffered damages due to the Mill Fire, you may be entitled to recover financial compensation. At Matt Huffman Law, we can help you seek compensation for a wide range of losses resulting from the fire, including:
In addition, we can help you recover underinsured and uninsured economic damages, such as recoveries for destroyed crops and landscaping. Additionally, our attorneys can recover the costs of evacuation for you, which may include the cost of food, lodging, and travel.
If you were affected by the Mill Fire in Weed, California, you may be eligible to file a claim for financial compensation. Homeowners, renters, and business owners who have suffered losses due to the fire caused by someone else’s negligence can file a lawsuit.
Hiring a Mill Fire Lawyer is essential to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. Here are some reasons why you should hire a Mill Fire Lawyer:
If you have any questions or concerns about your Mill Fire Claim, contact Matt Huffman Law today for a free consultation.
© 2024 Mathew Huffman Attorney at Law. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.
Attorney Advertisement: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
